In high-speed and RF PCB designs, controlling trace impedance is critical, but the role of RF via transitions is often underestimated. Vias, which connect signals between layers, can introduce impedance mismatches, signal reflections, and losses, especially at high frequencies. Proper design and optimization of via transitions are essential to maintain signal integrity and ensure reliable performance in RF and high-speed digital applications.

Key Considerations for RF Via Transitions

1. Signal Frequency and Bandwidth

• Low Frequencies (Below 3 GHz): Via transitions have minimal impact, and impedance matching is less critical. Ground return vias may not be necessary unless dealing with fast channels.
• High Frequencies (Above 5 GHz): Via transitions become increasingly inductive, requiring careful design of antipads and stitching vias to control impedance.
• mmWave Frequencies (Above 30 GHz): Via transitions require advanced techniques, such as eliminating stubs and optimizing antipad dimensions, to minimize parasitic effects.

2. Ground Plane and Via Spacing

• Ground Plane-Connected Vias: Space ground vias no more than 1/10th of the wavelength of the maximum operating frequency. For example, at 2.4 GHz, vias should be spaced 6 mm apart.
• Via Fences: In mmWave designs, use via fences around grounded coplanar waveguides to isolate high-frequency signals and prevent interference.

3. Antipad Design

• Role of Antipads: Antipads are the gaps between via plating and adjacent copper planes. They control the capacitance of the via, directly influencing its impedance.
• Optimization: Adjust antipad dimensions to fine-tune impedance, especially for high-frequency designs. Smaller antipads increase capacitance, reducing impedance.

Best Practices for RF Via Transitions

Best Practice	Description
Ground Return Vias	Use ground return vias for channels above 3 GHz to minimize impedance mismatch.
Stitching Vias	Implement stitching vias around signal transitions for frequencies above 5 GHz.
Blind and Buried Vias	Use blind or buried vias in HDI designs to eliminate stubs and reduce losses.
Via Placement	Place vias near PCB edges to reduce RF losses through the laminate.
Simulation and Optimization	Use 3D EM simulation tools to model and optimize via transitions.

Mitigating High-Frequency Impedance Issues

1. Stitching Vias

• Stitching vias reduce the inductive behavior of via transitions by providing a low-impedance return path.
• Place stitching vias close to signal vias to minimize impedance mismatches.

2. Antipad Adjustments

• Reduce antipad size to increase capacitance and lower impedance.
• Ensure antipad dimensions are consistent across all plane layers.

3. Layer Transitions

• For frequencies above 90 GHz, consider alternative layer transition methods that may not involve vias.
• Use backdrilling to remove via stubs in high-frequency designs.

Challenges with Via Impedance Calculations

1. Limitations of Online Calculators

• Online via calculators often fail to account for frequency-dependent impedance changes, leading to inaccurate predictions.
• These tools typically overestimate propagation delay, which is critical for phase-sensitive applications like mmWave phased arrays.

2. Role of 3D EM Simulation

• Complex Structures: Use 3D EM simulation software to model via transitions accurately, especially for designs with multiple layers and stitching vias.
• Simpler Structures: For straightforward designs, analytical models may suffice, but simulations provide greater precision.

RF Via Transitions in Low-Speed Designs

1. Low-Frequency Applications

• For signals with rise times significantly over 20 ns (e.g., I2C, GPIOs), via transitions have minimal impact.
• No special stitching or return vias are required.

2. Impedance Matching

• At low frequencies, via impedance closely matches the downstream transmission line if the sections are impedance-matched.
• Focus on maintaining consistent trace impedance rather than optimizing via transitions.

Advanced Techniques for mmWave Designs

1. Grounded Coplanar Waveguides

• Use grounded coplanar waveguides with via fences for mmWave designs to achieve high-frequency isolation.
• Ensure via spacing adheres to the 1/10th wavelength rule.

2. HDI and Microvias

• In HDI designs, use microvias with limited depth (100–150 µm) to minimize stubs and losses.
• Employ blind or buried vias for layer transitions in high-density designs.

3. Backdrilling

• Remove unused via stubs through backdrilling to reduce signal reflections and losses at high frequencies.

RF via transitions are a critical aspect of high-speed and RF PCB design, requiring careful consideration of frequency, impedance, and parasitic effects. By following best practices such as optimizing antipad dimensions, implementing stitching vias, and leveraging 3D EM simulations, designers can ensure reliable signal integrity across a wide range of frequencies. Whether working with low-speed signals or mmWave applications, understanding and addressing the challenges of via transitions is essential for successful PCB design.

As a manufacturer of Rogers PCBs, we are fully equipped to produce printed circuit boards made from Rogers materials, known for their durability and reliability. We offer high-mix PCBs, high-frequency Rogers PCBs, RF Rogers PCBs, SMT Rogers PCBs, Rogers PCB prototypes, and more. Our PCBs deliver reliability, efficiency, and high performance for a wide range of specialized applications.